ABSTRACT
The report quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moxibustion for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in China was evaluated by Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) and Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Moxibustion (STRICTOM). Computer and manual retrieval was used. Four databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKD, China Biomedicine (CBM), VIP and WNFANG were searched in combination with manual retrieval for relevant journals to screen the literature that: met the inclusive criteria, and CONSORT and STRICTOM were used to assess the report quality. A total of 52 RCTs were included. It was found that unclear description of random methods, low use of blind methods, no allocation concealment, no sample size calculation, no intention-to-treat analysis,inadequate report of moxibustion details and no mention of practitioners background existed in the majority of the RCTs. Although the quality of RCTs of moxibustion for KOA was generally low, reducing the reliability and homogeneous comparability of the reports ,the quality of heat-sensitive moxibustion RCTs was high. It was believed that in order to improve the reliability and quality of RCTs of moxibustion, CONSORT and STRICTOM should be introduced into the RCT design of moxibustion and be strictly performed.
Subject(s)
Humans , China , Databases, Factual , Moxibustion , Methods , Reference Standards , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Therapeutics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reference Standards , Research DesignABSTRACT
This article summarized the clinical researches on heat-sensitive moxibustion for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis from the aspects of simple heat-sensitive moxibustion and heat-moxibustion combined with other therapies. It analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the clinical application of heat-sensitive moxibustion, and discussed the ways of better using heat-sensitive moxibustion, with a purpose to inherit and develop it in clinical practice more efficiently.